How to Fight Character Assassination: Jujitsu versus Ninjistu

I've been traveling for a couple of weeks, and see that MYDD is a bit quiet now the primary season is over. But let's hope this is a temporary rest. We need to get our energy back. There's plenty of work to do

Those of us who have survived the primary season, regardless of candidates, have experienced a baptism of fire. Our debating skills are honed. Our troll awareness acute. And in the donjon of our internecine battles, we've probably learned more about ourselves than we intended.

Now it's time to use these virtual combat skills against the republicans

Let's get in some training my fellow MYDD Ninjas

I've been inspired by a quite wonderful piece about Jujitsu in Action: The Smart Way to Fight Smears Against Obama written by Joe Brewer on Open Left

It's all about the psychology of smears, and how to effectively counteract their ultimate purpose and moral intent. Some money quotes for you

What is the purpose of a smear?  Every smear has a proximate goal and an ultimate goal.  The proximate goal is to instill some false or misleading idea in the minds of listeners.  This serves the ultimate goal of subverting the moral character of the person being attacked.  

<snip>

This observation about the nature of smears leads to a piece of strategic advice: respond to the ultimate goal directly.  To focus on the proximate goal is to fall into a trap of reinforcing the original association that the smear-mongerer is pushing.  

A second observation can be made about the focus of a smear.  Karl Rove is famous for asserting that opponents should be attacked where they are strongest.  A key part of his approach that doesn't receive enough attention is the fact that the focus is always directed toward a perceived moral strength.  So when Obama's integrity is challenged by a smear, we can safely conclude that his integrity is widely seen as an advantage that his opponents must overcome.  

Another piece of strategic advice: respond with a focus on the moral weakness of the attacker, rather than the intended target of the original attack. To focus on the details of Obama's birthplace, for example, creates a sense of legitimacy to the controversy.  All the while, the attacker remains hidden in the wings and suffers no rebuke.

So come on my Ninja MYDD ninja. Let's get going against the character assassins



Display:


Re: How to Fight Character Assassination: Jujitsu (none / 0)

Give me a smear. Any smear. And I'll flip you in mental somersault slap down, which will turn the bad energy against your own bad self.

Or something like that.


Pointing to the inadequacies of John McCain
by duende on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 10:02:51 AM EST

Uh, so... (none / 0)

...just to be clear, the proper response to smears is attacking the messenger?

I don't necessarally disagree, I just thought it an odd way of saying it.


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.
by Dracomicron on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 10:17:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Uh, so... (none / 0)

In the Joe Brewer piece he points out that the factual attack - i.e. Obama is not a US citizen - is not best just argued about factually. It still imprints the accusation in people's mind. The best response is to find out what the real Rovian target is: i.e. a perceived moral strength. You then big up that (e.g. Obama's internationalism) and then contrast it with the relative moral weakness of the opposing candidate.

So it's about turning the attack on Obama into an attack on McCain, not necessarily the messenger.

I'm assuming, of course, that the smear merchants are effectively republicans


Pointing to the inadequacies of John McCain
by duende on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 10:21:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Uh, so... (none / 0)

Self correction: the perceived moral strength in the Obama is not a US citizen, is actually better described as his embodiment of the american dream: i.e. that anyone from anywhere can make it here


Pointing to the inadequacies of John McCain
by duende on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 10:22:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I read you. (2.00 / 1)

Obama's a master at that sorta thing already, I suppose.

I'm plenty guilty of discounting arguments just because they come from obvious trolls, but I'm more comfortable with a philosophy of turning it around on an opposing candidate than some random internet goon.


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.
by Dracomicron on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 10:23:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Rovian tactics are slightly more abstract (none / 0)

Perhaps I'm wrong, but I think it goes even deeper than that. The baiting about Obama's birthplace being unknown is not about his internationalism.

It is about him being an unknown. That is the root of the attack.

And the moral value they are attacking is the idea of changing the system. The inherent message is, "What kind of change is Obama going to bring?" Obama's outsider status. The way to combat it is to shine a spotlight on Obama's biographical details. I think we'll see that happen.

Meanwhile, McCain's moral strength is his maverick status and perceived integrity. If we keep hammering his numerous contradictory statements, we will win that debate. If we keep hammering him on his lobbyist connections, we will nullify his experience credentials. If you want to see what Republicans don't want to talk about, look at what gets a very public response from them and avoid the hell out of that issue. It's almost the opposite of the Democratic strategy for this year.

Remember, playing defense never wins a game, we must continually mount offense as well. Otherwise you just sit there waiting and hoping your opponent doesn't manage to score.


If you're being chased by an angry bull and then you notice you're also being chased by a swarm of bees, it doesn't really change things. Just keep on running.
by vcalzone on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 11:04:45 AM EST

I would submit (none / 0)

Saul Alinsky's 13 Rules for Radicals as the way to fight smears.


Student Guy=JoeMentum. No really Student Guy=JoeMentum, after all JoeMentum was an embarrassment so is Student Guy. This sig is FAIL!!
by Student Guy on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 01:17:21 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.